Jimpress

Welcome to the Jimpress Forum
It is currently Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:10 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Youngblood sues
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:47 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:40 pm
Posts: 621
Location: Warrington
'Scuse me? Hendrix bandmate sues over '03 release
By DAVID PORTER (AP) – 6 hours ago

LODI, N.J. — Lonnie Youngblood was a hotshot sax player on the New York club circuit in the mid-1960s when he crossed paths with Jimmy James, a young musician who was turning heads with his dazzling virtuosity on the electric guitar.

After briefly playing in Youngblood's band, James went back to using his real last name and conquered the music world as Jimi Hendrix, while Youngblood fronted a series of rhythm and blues bands that toured with James Brown, Jackie Wilson and other '60s legends.

The friendship between the two endured, though, and in 1969, at the peak of Hendrix's popularity, the two men recorded several songs in a New York studio that became a coda to their relationship when Hendrix died in London the following year of a drug overdose.

The tunes recorded during those two or three days are the subject of a lawsuit Youngblood filed this spring that claims one of the songs, "Georgia Blues," was included on a 2003 compilation without his permission and without crediting him as its author.

The suit seeks unspecified lost-income damages from Hendrix's estate, MCA Records and film director Martin Scorsese, who collaborated on the collection "Martin Scorsese Presents The Blues: Jimi Hendrix." Through representatives, all three parties declined to comment on the lawsuit or didn't return calls Monday.

The lawsuit has not marred Youngblood's memories of Hendrix, whom he describes in terms that evoke Chuck Berry's mythical "Johnny B. Goode":

"He had a guitar in a sack, a change of pants and a shirt in another sack, maybe a toothbrush and some type of comb. And basically that was it," Youngblood said. "He basically didn't have a worry."

Though Youngblood was just one year older than Hendrix, the blues shouter and the future prince of psychedelia were headed in opposite directions musically. Their paths began to diverge around 1965 or '66, when Hendrix discovered hallucinogenic drugs and began to spend more time in New York's Greenwich Village, Youngblood remembers.

"He wanted me to go down to Cafe Wha and play for tips," he said. "To me, that was out of the question. I had a car, a wife, a son, an apartment. I told him, 'You've got to go where you can get some sure money.'"

While Hendrix's popularity soared with such songs as "Hey Joe," "Purple Haze" and "Foxy Lady," Youngblood became a star on Harlem's club circuit and a fixture on college campuses around the Northeast. Then, one night in 1969 Youngblood was onstage when Hendrix showed up unexpectedly, wearing his signature floppy hat, tassels and ruffled shirt, and "turned the place inside out."

Hendrix told Youngblood he would record some songs with him, Youngblood remembers, as payback for his help several years earlier.

"Jimmy had moved on to another place by then, but it was his way of saying thank you," he said.

Youngblood said he wrote "Georgia Blues" and points out that one line in the song goes, "I was born in Georgia 27 years ago" — a clear reference to Youngblood, who was 27 at the time and a native of Augusta, Ga.

The lawsuit claims Youngblood released the song himself on the Internet and copyrighted it in 2002. Youngblood said he refused an offer of $3,000 by a lawyer for Hendrix's estate to sell the song.

Lawsuits over authorship or royalties from popular songs were hardly uncommon even back in Hendrix's heyday. Hendrix was dogged by a small-time record producer who claimed to have a contract giving him part of Hendrix's career earnings, according to David Henderson, author of the Hendrix biography "'Scuse Me While I Kiss The Sky."

New, or purportedly new, recordings made by legendary artists can produce the same feeding frenzy, he said.

"Stuff that's in the vault is very valuable and very important to collectors and historians and music lovers," he said. "If someone's famous, that stuff is going to have legs."

Youngblood, 68, who still performs at clubs and private parties in New York and northern New Jersey, said he just wants what is legally his.

"It's the principle," he said. "I want my song back. They had no right to take my song."

Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

_________________
=============================
Steve Rodham
Tired and emotional.
=============================


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Youngblood sues
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:59 pm
Posts: 579
Boot on the other foot me thinks :D
Serves them (EH) right. They have been active in the prevention of any monies due legally or from goodwill to Jimi's former band members and associates.
In this instance I fully support Mr Yougblood in his legal claim. Maybe EH will surprise us all and make a decent offer for settlement rather than drag it throught the courts in the hope of a lenthy duration.


Now due to EH / MS / MCA (will that be Universal then?) insistance of not paying royalties we get the following garbage raising it's stinking putrid head once more ...........................

"when Hendrix died in London the following year of a drug overdose"

Drug OD my arse ! Another poor hack who's falling short on his basic knowledge and understanding of his subject matter.

_________________
http://www.jmhvinyl.co.uk/home.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Youngblood sues
PostPosted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:16 pm
Posts: 105
I quite agree Gordon! EH were only too eager to sue the Sunday Times when they inadvertently licensed some Albert Hall tracks from Charly a few years ago, yet they do not seem to pursue Charly or the myriad other labels that have churned out "Smashing of Amps", "Little Ivey(sic)" etc over the last 40 years.

I did think it odd that "Georgia Blues" was listed as a Hendrix composition and it does show the arrogance of Janie etc that after making a derisory offer to Youngblood of $3000 which was rejected they then release it anyway!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Youngblood sues
PostPosted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:47 pm
Posts: 86
Location: Los Angeles
these two parties deserve each other. both trying to cash in on jimi in underhanded ways.
lonnie is not blameless either, considering how many releases over the years have credited
him & jimi and nobody else, even when including songs clearly by other artists. but that
doesn't excuse EH in the least.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Youngblood sues
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:24 pm
Posts: 103
I spent quite a bit of time with Lonnie in 1996, and I really don't think Lonnie has any control over all those albums that came out over the years. It's not like he was sitting around cashing royalty checks!

If you're interested in his perspective on things at that time, there's a link to an article about him off my Web site...

_________________
Regards, Frank
Visit my rock and racing writing at: http://www.loudfast.net
"I want to hear and see everything..." -- Jimi Hendrix


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Youngblood sues
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:59 pm
Posts: 579
Frank, be interesting if you could speak with him again and see what he has to say regards the current issue.
BTW, the article is worth a read. I was checking this out a few weeks ago.

_________________
http://www.jmhvinyl.co.uk/home.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Youngblood sues
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:47 pm
Posts: 86
Location: Los Angeles
i've never met lonnie, but it would surprise me if those 1971 sax overdubs he did for the first
Lonnie/Jimi releases were innocent. he had to have been complicit in some way in the cashing
in and ignoring other contributors on that original Maple LP, even if he didn't have control over
the myriad subsequent releases over the years.

not that it makes him unusually villainous, plenty of people have done worse!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group